----- Original Message -----
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Heads Up! BLP Update
At 11:43 AM 3/20/2010, Mike Carrell wrote:
Cited references in the documents include technical apers also on their
website, except Mills et.al, "Thermally Reversable Hydrino Catalyst
Systems as a New Power Source" which is not posted as yet [this is the
heart of the matter, possibly awaiting patent protection]. The papers
about the chemistry involved are dense and technical, but the results have
been verified by work at Rowan University in Glassboro NJ.
Work, of course, supported by Blacklight Power. I have no problem with
that, but independent replication it is not, not yet! I'm not placing any
bets in this race. I wish them well, their personal fortunes are at stake.
The issue of "independance" is a stinking red herring, casting apersions on
the staff of Rowan, and showing only a cursory review of what is actually in
the reports. The more severe test is tghe seven licensees of BLP
technioplogy, who had first-hand due diligence access to the personnel and
facilities of BLP and in some cases at least, replicatged the effects in
their own labs.
I've written before that if this is fraud, it's approaching the end game.
I appreciate BP's approach, they are bypassing normal scientific process,
which is probably necessary. In the end, though, unless they have
operating power plants, or demonstration models you can buy and operate,
overall scientific isn't likely to be moved unless there are truly
independent replications or verifications, and probably more than one or
two.
I don't know how anywone who has closely followed Mills' publications could
use the word "fraud". Yes, BLP is in the end game. A useable :"water engine"
must result from the two decades of effort and $60+ million investment. All
eveidence is positive at this point.
If I were them, I'd be trying to make a toy demonstration that shows clear
excess power, make it as cheap as possible, and sell it. But they could be
hampered by patent issues, that's the problem with the patent office
refusing patent protection. That's a legal problem. It should be possible
to get protection on "impossible devices." Perhaps some protection from
having filed with adequate description to build a device. Even if the
patent is not issued; later on, when someone tries to infringe, you'd have
evidence that the original filing was actually not of something
impossible! And that therefore the patent should have been issued, and
that therefore it should be issued now. And the infringer required to pay
licensing (perhaps with standing "damages" ameliorated, since they, too,
could be seen to be acting in good faith, after all, there was no patent!)
Mills' extensivwe pulications through the years constitute cointinuing
"reduction to practice". Patents have been inssued throughout the world, but
not "basic" patents, whci may require a court fight. [Mills has discovered
new "natural law" which is difficult to patent] A world-class patent firm is
handling the Intellectual Property issues. Making a toy or water heater is a
sure pathto bankruptcy. Electric utilitis were among the first investors.
Achievement of a working protoype "water engine" will refute critics and be
a basis for retrofit of power plants worldwide. As benchmarks are met, the
private funding available continues to increase.
Mike Carrell
