A quantitative evaluation- see please the claims in the Focardi Rossi paper- is foolproof I think. Heat from radioactive stuff at ths magnitudes is very dangerous, I think.
Next week we will celebrate the 21st anniversary of our field- and only the Patterson system in its day of glory was comparable to these claims- if I remember correctly. Is some other breakthrough of this type hidden somewhere? On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Michel Jullian <[email protected]>wrote: > 2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > > Someone asked me what I mean by "independent evaluations of the claims." > I > > mean that outside experts plan to go into the lab and observe the > > experiments, the way Rob Duncan looked at Energetics Technologies. > > Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as even if the experimental setup > is made fully open to the experts and they find nothing wrong with it > (heating resistor current as advertised etc), there is no way to be > sure there isn't a mundane source of heat such as a some radioisotope > hidden in the cell itself, unless Rossi lets them take it apart which > is unlikely. > > Michel > >
