Herewith some speculations about BLP strategy. Jed, and others, have long advocated full disclosure by LENR/BLP investigators and buuidilng samll proof-of-cocept toys to convince skeptics. Jed, in particular, is an adocate of the creative energy of entrepreneurs to expand a field. BLP's moves to cultivate a few licensees seems contrary to such expectations.
One must follow Nature, and not human expectatons. Mills has provided full disclosure, big time, in the years of posted experiments, patent applications, theoretical papers, and a constantly revised magnum opus, GUTCP. Key findings have been confirmed by competant investigators. By policy, BLP will license broadly and welcome *serious* inquiries and visits, but have no time for 'proving' or 'demolnstrations' to the curious who have not done their hiomework. Early investors were electric utilities. The pathof discovery amd invention has led to a complex catalytic chemistry which can be scaled to utilitiy applications where adequate technical support is expected and can be provided. Success at the 1 MW "water engine" level will include a mastery of all the ancillalry problems and a worldwide program of retrofitting power utilities. Once this becomes "real" one can expect a flood of entrepreneural energy to develop small scale applications, including automotive transportation. This is the realm that Jed has envisioned for years for "cold fusion" applications. All of this is much too big for BLP to handle. Garage mechanics can produce BLP effects, but will find that best results are had with the help of a license from BLP -- and those who invested in BLP should be repaid by royalties. Mike Carrell
