In reply to  Rich Murray's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:16:42 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>www.NewEnergyTimes.com/v2/library/2010/2010HagelsteinP-ConstraintsOnECP.pdf
[snip]
There is a typo in formula 1. The value between parentheses is always 1. Does
anyone know what was actually intended?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Reply via email to