Thank you for calling CF a surface effect, perhaps we have to add that it is a local effect, only separate point like active sites generate the heat. Unfortunately micron thin layers evaoprate immediately- can you imagine how much is 100W.sq.cm? And can you tell me a single* real example of heat excess obtained with such layers in the Pd/D2O system?* I have not lied when I was alive, should strat do it now? Should I give non-usable examples, advices to my grandson???
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Michel Jullian <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, Peter-in-the-grave :) Since CF is a surface effect, how about > plating just a few microns of Pd onto some cheaper metal? > > 2010/3/26 Peter Gluck <[email protected]>: > > Nice to hear from you, Terry. The trouble is that 0.1 mm is too thin, Pd > > overheats, melts- losses, problems etc. Can you calculate the surface > > temperature of the metal at a heat release of 100 Watts per square > > centimenter? > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> A bit of realistic sci-fi.. > >> January 6, 2028- my grandson who was educated in the spirit > >> of new energy, cold fusion is wonderful - has succeeded to > >> work out the perfectly reproducible energy generating method. > >> In the frame of a Pd - D2O system. > >> He is a respected citizen and as it is almost compulsory in > >> the New Moneytheistic society- a billionaire. He calls the > >> Chief Economist of his company: > >> "Mark, please buy the reserves of palladium any gram you > >> can we are going to conquer the world of energy, to replace > >> any dirty fossil fuel.. you see itis winter and it is so warm... > >> In two weeks the economist succeeds to buy 150 tonnes > >> of palladium. a real wizard. > >> My grandson's system releases 100 W per 1 sq.cm > >> of palladium, which is in the form of a thin layer of > >> 0.2 millimetres i.e 1 x 0.02 x 12 = 0.24 grams. > >> It is now simple to calculate that if > >> 0.24 g. give a power of 100 W, 200,000,000 g. > >> will give- 8.4 10 exp 10 W or 8.4 10 exp 7 kW. in a > >> more pragmatical language 84 millions of kWatts > >> Or 84,000 MWatts. (US consumes now appr. > >> 270,000 MWatts electricity) > >> Next step- how many kWatts is Mankind consuming. > >> Oh not so much, we are clever and are back at the value > >> of 2008. But this value is a bit greater-than what can CF give > >> He concludes: > >> the CF system can contribute but cannot conquer the market > >> of energy. > >> He visits my grave and has a long imaginary discussion > >> with me. I ask him to do better mathematics and > >> use the best data. Can you help him? Thanks! > > > > > >
