Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
The article was "deleted" from mainspace, article space.
The article was userfied at my request. Here it is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Abd/Cold_fusion_controversy
You can see the article history at
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAbd%2FCold_fusion_controversy&action=history
I suggest you use the other version:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/293wikipedia.html
It has some corrections.
You did do your work well, but without enough participation from the
other side.
All they wanted to do was chop everything I wrote in real time, and
delete it as quickly as possible. They are a bunch of fruitcakes.
When Pcarbonn's ban ran out, he began proper participation but was
banned again, this time as a "community ban," which would probably
have been easy to overturn if Pcarbonn had elected to challenge it.
I know how to do it, and offered to assist, off-wiki, but Pcarbonn
was by this time totally burned out. I don't blame him. He has
better things to do, as do I. But I would still help anyway.
Why waste your time?
Reviewer 2 wrote: "It is hard to imagine how 23.8 MeV of excitation
energy, nearly 9 orders of magnitude more than in the case of the
Moessbauer effect, could be coupled to and transferred to the
phonons of the lattice!"
Yes. It is hard to understand.
Note it says "hard to imagine." Never mind "understand"! This person
rejects stuff he cannot imagine. It is good thing scientists did not
used to do that. Quantum mechanics and much else seemed unimaginable
when first proposed.
- Jed
