Stephen sez: > On 04/06/2010 09:21 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > > This may already have been pointed out here, but it would appear that > > Steorn has finally published additional information on their PM > > configuration. The > > original demo... you know... The demo that failed spectacularly > > several years ago. > > > > http://www.steorn.com/orbo/pm/ > > > > There are two PDF files. > > > > http://www.steorn.com/images/asymmetry-and-energy-in-magnetic-systems.pdf > > http://www.steorn.com/images/magnetic-torque-measurement-system.pdf > > > > > > I always wondered what happened to the PM configuration, and why did > > they switch from PM to EM. It puzzles me that Steorn appears to have so > > many different OU configurations that they are playing around with > > So many? > > What makes you think they have *any* ? > > They've never demonstrated anything which was over unity, or even close > to unity. The PM configuration flat-out didn't work, and the EM > configurations consume *far* more power than they generate. > > > > , from > > Electromagnetic, Solid State, to Permanent Magnet designs.
Guess I should have included the word "claimed" ;-) I'm interested in whether anyone would like to critique to two PDF reports of "claimed" Steorn OU. Charts and graphs included. Lots-o-Charts & Graphics always gives the appearance of authenticity! ;-) Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
