2010/4/9 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: ... > I.e., radioactive decay. Come to think of that, isn't > this LENR? After all, nuclear, and takes place at low temperatures
Good point. > (I've never seen anyone use LENR to refer to radioactive decay, mostly > because something that happens with a single nucleus isn't thought of as a > "reaction," i.e., something with more than one particle to start, something > happens between them, they "react" or or with each other.) So you don't think of H2O -> H2 + 0.5 O2 as a reaction? ;-) No, you're right that LENR isn't restrictive enough. Come to think of it there is probably no better term than Cold Fusion for Cold Fusion. Michel
