In reply to [email protected]'s message of Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:21:18 +0000 (UTC): Hi, [snip] >A new paper Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst system as a new Power >Source http://blacklightpower.com/papers/EngPower032610S.pdf
Note that Mills concentrates on H[n=1/4]. Interestingly if the radius is quadratic in n (as in my model), rather than linear (as in Mills), then n=1/4 in my model yields the same radius as n=1/16 in Mills model, and Mills predicts that for this size the Hy- is at it's maximum binding energy (70 eV). Reason perhaps why he gets so much H[n=1/4]? :) (If I use his formula for calculating the binding energy of the second electron, but substitute n^2 for n, I get the same maximum binding energy as he does, but at n=1/4). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
