Opps again - as you can tell - this is all new terminology (invented on the fly) but it looks more consistent if 5-space (3 of space and two of time) is labeled this way:
D1 (the timeless dimension) T1+D2 (our 2-space) T1+D3 (our spacetime) T2+D2 = D4 (hyper-2-spacetime) T2+D3 = D5 (hyper-3-spacetime) OK - hope this is the last you will hear from me on Calvet + Chin - till this sinks in, in a few days Jones ________________________________ opps - should be: T1+D2 (our spacetime) I am using a borrowed computer - new iMac with the world's finest screen and most brain-dead keyboard Jobs can be a headstrong fool in the pursuit of art over practicality. ________________________________ Another possibility is two time dimensions, but neither apply to D1.' IOW the five dimensions can be listed as: D1 (the timeless dimension) T1+D2 (our 2-space) T2+D2 (our spacetime) T2+D3 (hyper-2-space) T2+D4 (hyper-3-space) This amalgamates the Chin "two dimensions of time" hypothesis with the Clavet "5 dimensions" by redefining hyperspace as everything in T2. Jones ________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:30:00 AM Subject: [Vo]:5-Space and the Perfect Cube "Evidence for the Existence of 5 Real Spatial Dimensions in Quantum Vacuum" http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ejournaloftheoretics%2Ecom%2FArticles%2F3-1%2Fcalvet-final%2Ehtm&urlhash=lJKv makes a good case for the reality of 5- Space based on the physical spacing of Casimir formula being 1/ D^4. I am of course having difficulty getting my arms around any visualization of 5D but had an idea I wanted to run by the Vortex collective. Could 5D be segregated into two groups of 4 dimensions where 1 spatial dimension is unshared and goes flat from the perspective of an observer in the “other” 4? just like a time cone cartesian plane depicts , 3D goes flat to where we are collapsed into the present from a temporal perspective. I know from reading your articles there are far more dimensions but am concentrating of course on the Casimir force vector and how to exploit its interactions on the time axis. I am suggesting that Mill's orbitsphere or any of the other fractional hydrogen researchers are dealing with a relativistic/ flattened perspective due to this temporal interaction due to Casimir force. Our take on vacuum fluctuations is similar and I might even take a wild guess that the Black hole empties back into one of these 2 higher dimensions to produce the imbalance that keeps vacuum fluctuations aqueezing through our 3D present - where the present marches forward to the great attractor pushed by this pressure directed into our past by the attractor which acts like a giant battery. The 3D present acts like a load and vacuum flux the current that winks into and out of existence because it can only form physical pairs in 3-d space. But that is all speculation while the 5D connection to Casimir effect appears plausible in this paper and agrees with Jan Naudts concept of relativistic hydrogen. My question or posit is if a 3D+ time "reality" where matter can still exists is possible sharing a different 4 of 5 dimensions. My question/posit hinges on the time dilation which we observe in gravity wells and IMHO inside casimir cavities as curving space... The question becomes if this time dilated mass is just stretching space in our existing dimension or is it collapsing one of our spatial dimensions and traveling in another dimension that normally appears flat to us. Could we be in one reality T+ D1,D2,D3 while another reality exists as T+ D2,D3,D4?
