From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 9:19 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: hydrogen pressurized nickel tube in Potassium carbonate
Mike I agree the "theoretical" concepts between Mills and Arata are poles apart but they are both based on the same Exploitable physical environment of a saturated lattice. It doesn't matter if they refer to condensed matter, fractional states of hydrogen or Casimir effect. The methods may be related through some Casimir enhanced interim step or they may be independent but are both only possible based on the saturated environment. What surprised me about this early paper http://hydrino.org/documents/anomalous-heat-from-atomic-hydrogen.pdf Was the constant circulation of monatomic hydrogen through the catalytic layer. It is only one layer compared to the Haisch- Moddel patent where hundreds of stacked plates forming columns of .1u Casimir cavities separated by insulating layers force the fractional hydrogen to constantly translate between normal and fractional values as it circulates through the columns. Most pressurized systems like Aratas' nested Pd reactor simply pressurize without circulation. I have a pet theory that fractional dihydrinos resist change in Casimir geometry / catalytic action while atomic hydrogen can translate freely between fractional states. This would create an asymmetry for translation due to catalytic/Casimir action based on the state of the atomic bond. This would make the circulation outlined in the H&M patent a key component to liberating the energy. Professor Moddel has already done some math regarding the COE of pushing the gas through their proposed prototype and surprisingly the counter force opposing circulation is not conservative. IMHO this method organizes the normally chaotic energy of gas law to help break the diatomic bond to free the fractional atoms to translate to a new value - We would never be aware of this force as exploitable in the macro world because you need an environment that organizes atoms into different fractional values to exploit. Regards Fran On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:11: Mike Carrell said Fran, I haven't seen the paper you refer to. Mills conducted other experiments with thin-walled nickel tubing, with the tubing evacuated and coupled to a mass spectrometer. The objective was to detect hydrinos wich diffused through the tubing wall after being created at the outer surface. My understanding that at the time there was some disagreements between Thermacore and Mills, each going their own way. I wasn't tracking Mills' work closely at the time. Better sources may be Tom Stolper, who wrote two books about Mills, the last being titled "America's Newton. The other surce would be Dr. John Farrell, a close associate of Mills, who moderates "Society for Classical Physics" list. The physical concepts underlying Mills' and Arata's work are poles apart. Mills' is chemistry, Arata's is nuclear physics.
