Oops! Now I see why you recommended the hydrogen bond since the h2> d1 exchange doesn't necessarily require the h2 be disassociated . a cluster of atoms could simply exchange the d1 for h2 using only electrostatic or hydrogen bonding. I got my theories confused at one point and was referring to disassociation of h2 in ref to the exchange theory in error.
Regards Fran From: francis [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:41 PM To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com' Subject: RE: [Vo]:Grabowski thinks the effect the NRL is seeing is chemical Jones, I inadvertently quoted you out of context in my previous reply supporting a covalent bond when you were clearly advocating hydrogen bonding. Jones Beene said on Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:18:49 -0700 Fran, This could be an important paper for expanding the concept into an alternative method of chemical thermal cycling - for either heating or cooling purposes. There could be anomalous gain derived from Casimir heating in this kind of situation, but that is not claimed. And it is only "implied" if you should chose to look for it. [reply] I can see anomalous heat coming from continuous Grabowski H2<>D1 transformations where changes in ZPE due to suppression disassociate bonds that are then are free to re-associate and release the energy just rectified but I don't think the cooling scenario would be based on h2<>d1 exchange. I think suppression geometry is a segregating force - that is for areas suppressed there are always boundaries where the lower energy density inside acts like an insulator to the ambient density outside the boundary. IMHO the wind sail with a hole analogy extends to lattice and surface geometry as well as Van der Walls - anything that breaks the isotropy of energy density will have an equally opposing effect on the opposite side of its boundary condition (although not necessarily as concentrated -again like a large sail feeding a small hole). As a segregating effect time dilation can be in either direction resulting in cooling instead of heating or delays in spontaneous emission instead of acceleration depending on the location of gas atoms relative to these segregated suppression and compression fields. I think delayed spontaneous emission in waveguides may actually be due to these segregated "compression" fields because EM suppression should accelerate the emission rate. Like a Casimir cavity I posit the suppression to be concentrated in a small area while the compression is distributed over a much larger area more likely to interact with the gas atoms. [/reply] Regards Fran
