DEAN you KILLJOY(not)~;-) Hey; If we blow the 'anti-matter' cover then Star-Trek get's CANCELED. . . AND: ?Aren't the super-colliders racing a micro-thimble's worth of Anti-Matter around the track so that a virtual ARMY of ping-pong playing & tenured physicists can maintain their credentials and PAYCHECKS? Mostly this is an elaborate & intentional 'campaign of disinformation; methinks.' HEISENBURG'S 'Uncertainty' is having big-play in this global CHARADE; now you see the wee lil' Anti-Matter(s) & Now you DON'T. MOSTLY-------> It's never been anything but DON'T. When Galaxies (Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass bodies with Singularity Centres-balanced 'grey-holes') reach light-speed at the Universe-bubble border their respective hub-grey-hole singularity centres dialate to BLACK-HOLE status at the AexoDarkEnergy-Hyperspace frontier and to the fanfare of MEGA-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTERS are 'eaten' back into parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace. Hadron-Cern copies the above process using super-energized-accelerated Protons aka (MICRO Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass with Singularity Centres-balanced (micro-grey-holes'). At the appropriate quasi-light-speed acceleration point the Proton-grey-hole-Centre dialates to MICRO-Black-Hole Status and SUCKS itself-shut to the fanfare of a MICRO-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTER(notable) energy release. . . . and this process is that which was touted as the FICTIONAL 'anti-matter-annihilation energy-release' phenomenon. But MUCH energy IS being released but NOT from fictional anti-matter-annihilation. ?Why does not said Micro-Black-Hole-Singularity EXPAND dangerously. EASY. The hugely-overwhelming proximal PLANETARY MASS-PROTON dynamic equilibrium simply SQUASHES-SHUT the Einstein-Rosen Micro-Black-Hole access to parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace. This could be the LAW of AETHYR-M-BRANE PROXIMAL ELECTRO-GRAVIONIC FIELD HYPER-TENSOR EQUILIBRIUM(especially near High-mass Bodies; like planets AND even being near a 'free-black-hole' the PROXIMAL M-BRANE TENSOR FIELD would 'preclude' any 'other' relatively 'near-by' singularity formation.) EVEN the same parallel macro-phenomenon of a Fission-Bomb's Plasma-Gyro-Toroidal creates the 'micro-singularity-centre' which ingresses the classic INGRESS MUSHROOM PILLAR, which initiates a FUSION PILLAR within the FISSION RELEASE GYRO-TOROIDAL MAELSTROM. And even this notable (miniscule but relatively large/to-us) ingress of parallel-AexoDE-Hyperspace plasma is QUICKLY SQUASHED-SHUT by the Solar-System/Planetary Electro-Gravionic Field tension upon our immediately surround 'space-M-brane.' LOS ALAMOS: Manhattan's 'Teller etc.' thought that the 'bomb's' reaction would 'cascade-open-exponentially' and consume the ENTIRE MASS OF THE EARTH and maybe the solar system. But 'Singularity' is the MODEL & RULE of all 'Mass-Matter-Gyro-Toriodal' constructs in the Bubble-Universe which accounts for pretty-much EVERYTHING. And the natural M-Brane/Aether Electro-Gravionic super-tensor field-state STABILIZES this COSMIC/AEXOCOSMIC fluid-dynamic energy circulation SYSTEM. So obviously the above HIGHLY FUNCTIONAL MODEL pretty much excludes the so-called anti-matter & thusly anti-matter annihilation-model. And because of the above stated LAW of M-Brane FIELD-TENSOR Equilibrium the notion of MORONS that Cern-Hadron is 'creating' so-called DEADLY BLACK-HOLE is mostly BS. HOWEVER: Being able to FIRE-DIRECT a stream of BLACK-HOLE STATE ACCELERATED PROTONS aka 'Micro-Black-Holes' is probably DOABLE & would make ONE HECK OF A POTENT WEAPON>(maybe already in existence)< Cheers Jack Harbach O'Sullivan~:-) > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:33:01 -0700 > Subject: Matter-Anti-matter Annihilation > From: [email protected] > > > Hi, everybody, > I have a question that I need an answer for, It is:. IS THERE > ACTUALLY, ANYWHERE, A VERIFIABLE CASE OF MATTER-ANTI-MATTER > ANNIHILATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE hYDROGEN ATOM OR ABOVE? > > It seems to be dogma that "Matter" and "Anti-matter" annihilate on > contact to revert to pure "Energy." > > Our work suggests that this is nonsense, and in fact, "Matter{,as we > know it, is made up to a great extent of a unit, the electron, and > another unit, the proton, which could be considered as, respectively, > "matter" and "anti-matter" units by a logic which I have outlined > elsewhere. In fact, there seems to be evidence developing that the > "nuetron count" of an atom is actually a count of the number of > nucleons which are at any given instant in a > state of "anti-electron, anti-proton" i.e. an "Anti-matter state." > By this view, everything is made up of a balance of what we consider > as "Matter," (electrons and protons) and Anti-matter (anti-electrons > and anti-protons.) > > The point is that I can't find a thing in the literature of a true > case of matter-anti-matter annihihaation other than the known electron- > anti-electron situation which , aat least by my reasoning, is a > combination "reaction" to form another ocsillator rather than a > distruction to wave motion (electromagnetic radiation.) > > IF SOME ONE HAS THE TIME, COULD THEY DO A LITERATURE SEARCH ON ANTI- > MATTTER AND SEE IF, ANWHERE, THERE IS A VERIFIABLE CASE OF ACTUAL > "MATTER-ANTI-MATTER ANNIHILATION' FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE ELECTRON- > ANTI-ELECTRON CASE? On a quick scan, I could find nothing.... > > seems to me this might make a basis for a good science article for > some aspiring wirter, with a title something like "Anti-Matter > Myths..." > > Thanks, Dean (Eski) > > -- _________________________________________________________________ http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
