At 09:58 PM 10/2/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Terry Blanton <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
They all look like they have hangovers.
They sure do!
Is this is the best Steorn can come up with?
They are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
- Jed
Well, you know, those Irish....
Everything I've seen so far is consistent with my
operating hypothesis. They found a small anomaly,
difficult to explain, or at least difficult
enough to be able to provide some cover. And they
figured out how to make money from it. The plan
requires keeping as much of it as possible
secret, so that people will pay for the secret,
and then, for publicitly, leaking out useless information in dribs and drabs.
There is nothing revealed in this video. At all. As was noted, 300% of what?
Something else I came across looking at the comments on the video:
http://www.terawatt.com/
I notice the following details:
1. They make a big deal out of UL and TUV
"verification." That's verification of their
sensors. "TUV Rheinland of North America Inc. and
Underwriters Laboratories did not evaluate our
complete system." The UL report gives a huge
amount of detail, presented in a way that is very
difficult to read through.... It appears to show
output power much greater than input power, but
... without knowing exactly how these were
calculated.... And it's easy to get output power
greater than input power, what's difficult (or,
more to the point, probably impossible) is to get
output *energy* greater than input energy, i.e., power integrated over time.
2. They talk about the output shaft, "output
energy" as being an "oscillation." And then they
say, under "Current development," "We developed a
technology that allows this oscillation to be permanently harnessed."
So ... at 300%, and at the power levels they are
talking about, it shouldn't be difficult to
transfer the output power to the input shaft,
thus creating a loop that would run forever. That
UL report is very polished. It was two years ago. What's up, Terawatt?
3. And what's with the name? A tad hopeful, eh?
http://www.terawatt.com/ecm1/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=180
("News")
No dates on the "News."
http://www.terawatt.com/ecm1/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=58&Itemid=127
("About us")
http://pesn.com/2010/07/14/9501672_Terawatt_Research_LLC_defies_free_energy_stereotypes/
(PESN article on Terawatt Research)
Allan writes: "Both data plots clearly show
performance frequency ranges in which much more
energy is produced from the system than what is
required to drive the system at least
three-fold." No. The plots show power, not
energy. Now, if the power has been properly
integrated, this would indeed be directly related
to energy. I'm put off my feed, though, by the claim of "oscillation."
It's fascinating to see how many commentors on
Terawatt fall for the UL/TUV reports as being an
endorsement of energy claims. It worked. They
paid a pretty penny for those reviews of their
sensors! Which is all they were, reviews of
sensors and verification of some sensor readings
at various rotational rates. Very specifically
not a review of "overunity" energy claims.
The current Google street view shows that the
Terawatt Research sign on their alleged building is no longer there....
Floor plan of the building, their suite is (was?)
just the front....
http://www.cbre.com/NR/rdonlyres/60701035-734F-4EAE-BDBC-FBB338D28A4A/293596/FloorPlans_A.pdf
I wonder if it was ever there. Cheaper to
photoshop it than to have the sign fabricated and
put up. Allan at PESN might know.
These are people who are supposedly secretive,
but who have paid good money to craft a very
clean appearance of being flush and very, very
professional. Their "strategic advisor" is listed
as Judge William H. Webster, who was indeed the
director of the CIA and the FBI. Many years ago. He's 86 years old or so.
