I believe Mill's has already promoted the idea of hydrogen atoms acting as a catalyst for other hydrogen atoms: http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/Eng%20Power050410S.pdf (pg 6) "Hydrogen atoms may serve as a catalyst wherin m=1, m=2, m=3 for one, two, and three atoms, respectively, acting as a catalyst for another." So perhaps the "soup" of heated hydrogen atoms around a tungsten filament is itself capable of self catalyzing and allowing fractional hydrogen atoms (h/x) to form fractional hydrogen molecules(h2/x) that can disassociate at a "discount" if triggered to do so while their molecular motion to a different catalytic level (change in the catalytic geometry/proximity to the catalyzing molecule) is being opposed by the covalent bond. This is my own pet theory that the covalent bond of fractional h2 can accumulate the normally chaotic motion of gas law by opposing the further fractional translations of the atomic orbitals forming the molecule. This theory lends itself well to various applications of PWM circuits in water fuel cells and the MAHG n that a sudden pulse can trigger disassociation early before the opposition that the bond is creating between the orbitals and the Casimir field that is trying to reshape them is translated into motion away from the field. Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:IRVING LANGMUIR AND ATOMIC HYDROGEN From: Roarty, Francis X Ø Upon recombination, heat energy is released to the tune of 90.000 cal/gram molecule. Note: Moller made a silly mistake in his original paper in confusing "c" with "C" (unless it has been corrected). This keeps being quoted online by others, as if it was accurate. There is obviously no such simple gain on recycling hydrogen from molecule to atomic and back, i.e. the "recombination of hydrogen" - and if there is gain at all, it must be of more complicated non-chemical origin (nuclear, ZPE or supra-chemical). In the past some of us have used the term 'supra-chemical' to indicate interactions with inner orbitals, as opposed to valence electron reactions - which probably itself relates to ZPE as the ultimate source of energy (as does the Casimir force interaction, if there is found to be net gain). * The small calorie or gram calorie (symbol: cal) approximates the energy needed to increase the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1 °C. This is about 4.2 joules. * The large calorie, kilogram calorie or food calorie (symbol: Cal) approximates the energy needed to increase the temperature of 1 kilogram of water by 1 °C. This is exactly 1000 small calories or about 4.2 kilojoules. Big difference. Moller must not have consulted Wiki-the-Wise on this critical detail although I hope he has corrected the error by now ...
