At 09:25 PM 10/13/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
It goes on.
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2010/oct/11/cold-fusion/
Good place for me to stop. Kemosabe has obsessively added many
responses, that demonstrate to anyone who is watching, and who is
netural, the bankruptcy of his position. His last post asserts that
Naturwissenschaften published the Cold fusion review as a "Hail Mary"
play, desperate to come out on top.
Yeah, right. Springer-Verlag, pretty much King of the Heap, overall,
is going to risk their reputation on flogging bogus, fringe nonsense.
No, this skepticism is a Hail Mary play, showing just how dead the
skeptical position is on cold fusion.
He'd never get this garbage past peer review. And that is what some
skeptics will attempt. We'll see what NW publishes.
