"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke", "Profiles of The Future", 1961 (Clarke's third law) " After all, we are a very young species in a very old universe."
In America circa 1824 a particular individual 'steeped' in Masonic tradition stated straightforwardly that our planet was terraformed in another system and then 'moved' to this Sol-system and placed in it's orbit where it remains. The 'terraforming' progenitor race was said to be ancient beyond calculation and per the perspective of Arthur C. Clarke was of greatly superior 'magic;' and hense 'gods' relative to the new race that they were crafting from several anthropoid inputs. And finally the proto-homonids having grown adapted to this planetary environment, were sufficiently DNA developed for the 'gods' to directly 'input' their genes into the (human)females of the planet. And thusly the earth's present entire population descends from these guys. This would tend to indicate that the terraformer-progenitors possessed advanced DNA modification abilities which our own DNA-bio-sciences are already approaching even from our relatively young & thusly 'primitive' stage of development. Yet if the very 'genes' we are working from are at least partially direct-seminal-inputs from our highly-evolved progenitors; then that we would likely tend to 'quantum-leap' regularly throughout history would indicate that those regular 'upgrades' are still being injected into the general genus-homo-sapiens-sapiens population and the terraforming-project would logically 'still' be ongoing. It is notable that as soon as we first awoke to Jules Verian notions of traveling to other celestial objects that we would also 'immediately' began to imagine that it were possible to terraform same. We didn't miss a beat. That 1824 pre-Vern/pre Huxley visionary made the obvious leap that such an ancient race that would be capable of advanced gravity-manipulating Z-Point energy technologies. In perspective the terraformer-progenitors would have reached a relatively 'godlike' level of developement relative to our own young race. And that visionary also made the statement that those 'gods' began like us and that we would eventually reach their level of evolution & beyond in the statement; "As 'man' is, the god(s) were; and as the god(s) are, eventually man will become like." ?Is this the famous 'secret-gnosis' that the Masonic-Gnosis traditions have been preserved since very-young 'mankind' was just becoming introspectively 'aware' and when still, possibly some of the our terraforming-progenitors were still openly moving among them? And were Arthur C. Clarke & Jules Verne & Aldous Huxley & H.G. Wells Masons as well? South-Pacific Islanders circa WW-II were found to, when we made 'first-contact' with them after the War, to be worshipping as 'gods' very good likeness of Aeroplanes that they had seen in their skys re; the heavy war-plane saturation of the contending Airforces in the War. And likely those 'natives' dismissed the very few WINGED-UFOs that very seldom turned up 'before' the War as having been merely the 'halucintions' & 'wild imaginations' of the few 'experiencers' among their numbers. . . . Food for thought. . . I wonder if 'our' gods are athiests?~;-)~JHO'S~PS: The 'Masonic Visonary circa-1824 was Joseph Smith Jr.----->go figure. . . DISQUALIFIER----> I am NOT a Mormon. . . . but it 'is' somewhat curious; especially from someone of 1824; one can only wonder where Joe Smith got those ideas that he hung onto so stubbornly; and especially since it cost him his life(along with having too many extra wives~:-). But currently at least we have, as a population become at least somewhat 'warmer' toward these kinds of ideas, possibilities. . . > Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:43:48 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:We'll Never Make 2012 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:18 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As the entire fleet bore down on Earth, as they entered our > > atmosphere, they were eaten by a dog. > > > Being an dyslexic atheist, Doug was clearly ashamed to admit that it > is a god which protects us. > > :-) > > “"I contend that we are all atheists. I just believe in one fewer god > than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other > possible gods, then you will understand why I dismiss yours." > - Stephen Roberts” > > I love the militant agnostic bummer sticker: > > "I don't know, AND NEITHER DO YOU!" > > Me, I play it safe and believe in all gods. > > > T >
