this may be what Frank Z meant. Philips describes the fields as mostly negating
each other – in effect overlapping and cancelling out as they extend beyond the
atomic scale such that we can only measure the dynamic difference as the
electron and it’s infinite field orbits around the nucleus which has an
infinite field that remains motionless relative to it. I guess this would be
another way to create the Dirac sea with all these infinite fields in motion
relative to each other :_). I haven’t read the paper yet – only watched the
video so far
Regards,
Fran
Thanks Fran. To be sure I don't know all of the answers, I am just looking for
ways to produce new energy and propel to the stars. My model is quite
classical. I start by asking, if the magnetic field is attached to a magnet,
and the the magnetic field of the photon propagates at light speed. Why the
difference? What attaches the field in one but not the other. I conclude
that the magnetic field of the magnet is attached at elastic discontinuity. It
the same thing (defects) the attaches the magnetic field in a superconductor.
Then I ask what releases the fields? II concluded that it it takes place at
fixed velocity (not frequency).
Then I go on to say that magnetism (the dynamic component of a field) is not
conserved. It comes from nothing and can increase or decrease without bound.
I make the assumption that the property applies to all of the magnetic fields,
the electromagnetic, gravitomagnetic, and the nuclear spin orbit forces. then
I state and try to prove that the magnetic component of all of the force
equalizes during the quantum transition. It a point of continuity. I describe
this condition and apply it to cold fusion and gravity modification.
I hit head long in to the problem of wave function collapse. How can this
happen at superluminal velocities. Energy cannot flow faster that light speed.
I also conclude its a cancellation were the negative energy of the
gravitomagnetic field equals the positive energy of the electromagnetic field.
The zero energy field can then collapse without restriction. I use this as
addition evidence that the strength of the gravitomagnetic component increase
during transition.
Finally, how do we get over that pesky coulombic barrier at low energy. My
answer is that we don't work with the original static electric field. What we
do is dramatically increase the range and strength of the nuclear magnetic
field ( the spin orbit force). I reaches through the coulombic and flips
nucleons.
I need not extra dimensions ( even when I provide a unification of sp
relativity and quantum physics) I need no sea of zero point energy, I need
not either. I need no shrunken atoms.
-----Original Message-----
From: francis <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, Nov 20, 2010 4:51 pm
Subject: [Vo]:changed to Infinite Fields
Hi Robin, Yes – more so than I and he picked up on something Frank Z might
appreciate – where Frank Z says the energy is all ready in the MATTER and
doesn’t need any ether or outside source of energy, j Philips seems to say the
mass-energy conservation between the mass and it’s infinite field also has the
energy already in there just changing forms – this may be what Frank Z meant.
Philips describes the fields as mostly negating each other – in effect
overlapping and cancelling out as they extend beyond the atomic scale such that
we can only measure the dynamic difference as the electron and it’s infinite
field orbits around the nucleus which has an infinite field that remains
motionless relative to it. I guess this would be another way to create the
Dirac sea with all these infinite fields in motion relative to each other :_).
I haven’t read the paper yet – only watched the video so far
Regards,
Fran
Mixent said on Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:16:49 -0800
In reply to francis 's message of Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:14:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Or this: http://www.youtube.com/user/audrip
[snip]
..so this guy has proven that he can read and understand Mills. ;) The bit about
infinite electric fields is straight out of Mills.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
