The problem is that they say 300% but they don't say 300% of what? 300% of a few milliwatts? 1 watt? 10 watts? 100 watts?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Some of the people in this latest video have appeared in earlier Steorn > videos. > > Harry > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <[email protected]> > > To: Vortex <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sun, November 21, 2010 2:47:29 PM > > Subject: [Vo]:Steor has a new promo at their web site > > > > FWIW, > > > > Steorn's home page recently posted what I believe is a new You-Tube > promo > > where they have interviewed several engineers from the Orbo Evaluation > and > > Development Unit. What interested me were comments coming from some of > the > > engineers, specifically that they have measured up to 300 percent OU. > They > > go on to state that the margin of error is so far out of the ball park > that > > it can't be due to measurement error. One evaluator said the device > simply > > needs someone to take it by the "scruff of the neck" and work with it. > > > > It's been my personal policy to remain neutral on the Storn issue - as > much > > as I possibly can. The only personal observations I'd like to interject > here > > is the fact that listening to these engineers I came away with the > feeling > > that they truly believe they have witnessed OU. Whether they really have > is, > > of course, what continues to be debated, and rightly so. > > > > At present the main reason I remain doubtful of the OU claims is based > on > > personal conjecture that if Stoen's team really has been able to > repeatedly > > finesse up to 300% OU why haven't they been able to develop some kind of > a > > demonstration contraption that clearly demonstrates a closed loop system > in > > action. Can someone please refute me on the following conjecture: Surely > > it's possible to develop SOME kind of a prototype that is capable of > > exploiting 300% OU. Again, Such a device doesn't have to be pretty, and > it > > certainly doesn't have to be economically viable. Proving economic > viability > > is not the point. Proving OU actually exists IS the point. All the > device > > has to show to the skeptical world is the fact that it proves > unequivocally > > that it can self-sustains its own momentum - with a tiny bit of excess > > energy left over to spare. If they could just assemble something as > simple > > as that - all bets would be off. > > > > I'm still waiting. So is Mongo. > > > > Stay tuned. > > > > Regards, > > > > Steven Vincent Johnson > > www.OrionWorks.com > > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > > > > > > >
