Would you be kind enough to provide me with some links regarding the
competing theories to explain this phenomena? Or even a basic break down (or
your personal opinion)?

I checked blacklight's website and it was basically useless (although with
pretty animations). Thanks.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:54 AM, francis <[email protected]> wrote:

> Like a poorly advertised movie that goes on to great success I think the
> latest Black Light confirmations are poisoning the critics, It was a double
> barrel approach that still falls short of proving one theory over another
> but does confirm that over unity is occurring and provides  multiple off the
> shelf formulas with high repeatability. The 2nd barrel was the correlation
> of light spectrum between astrophysics and the odd spectrum black light
> associated with this anomaly – Again the evidence doesn’t necessarily prove
> the Mill’s theory over others  but does prove that some type of translation
> is occurring be it Mill’s hydrino, Jan Naudt’s relativistic hydrogen or some
> of the other exotic forms of hydrogen proposed by researchers such as
> inverse Rydberg, condensed hydrogen, etc, etc…. Personally I think the
> astrophysics results represent high spatial  velocity hydrogen at the macro
> scale while the Black Light plasma from experiment represent a  nano scale
> equivalent velocity.
>
>
>
> Multiple teams of Rowan faculty and students performed the replications
> using old and new recipes with off the shelf materials. The heat output was
> up to 6.5 times greater than the maximum heat available from combustion or
> other chemical reactions of the material. I think the real significance of
> these tests may be that they now force widespread replications of the
> process that the critics can’t possibly cover up – the results will trump
> both sides and only the facts will remain. Something is clearly going on
> here and, right or wrong regarding theory, everyone has to admire Dr Mils
> for forcing the mainstream to acknowledge results that indicate over unity.
>
> Regards
>
> Fran
>

Reply via email to