If you allow me to butt-in (because it was my "discovery"), Frank was
talking about how his equation for the orbital radii in terms of Fmax
(29.05N), Coulombic radius, and speed of transition also gives the orbital
radii of muonic hydrogen.
But to give the proper answer you have to use the reduced mass of the muon.
Actually if you want a more accurate result, you should use the reduced
electron mass also (but it only gives a .1% difference).
Here's the muonic hydrogen equation in latex formatting:
r_{x}=n^{2}\left[\frac{F_{max}r_{c}^{2}}{v_{t}^{2}\mu_{-\mu}}\right]
The terms in brackets = the ground state radius = 285 femtometers.
Also last night I was able to solve for Planck's constant using that same
equation... I posted about that earlier today.
Peace.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Thanks for your commentary. ... of course I have more questions.
>
> I don't consider myself a card carrying hydrino believer. Maybe the
> little buggers exist... maybe not. I dunno. Meanwhile, there is
> confirmed consensus that muons DO exist - particularly muoniums -
> where a positive muon particle temporarily mimics the behavior of a
> hydrogen atom nucleus while a normal electron orbits at a
> significantly closer distance than what is normally observed in the
> accepted ground state. As such I can see how certain interactions
> claimed to be happening close to the QM atomic scale could become a
> little muddled, perhaps even "misinterpreted", based on perceptual
> filters most of us tend to encase ourselves within while using
> favorite pet theories to explain our perceptions of TOE.
>
> I'm far more interested in trying to discern how accurate, how
> reliable BLP's claimed heat measurements might be. How reliable is the
> collected evidence that has been coming out of Rowan University's
> research labs, allegedly performing due diligence on Dr. Mill's
> controversial BLP process. One would think that these university
> researchers know what they are doing. One would think that the
> reputation of Rowan University's research facilities is very much at
> stake here.
>
> Adding more BLP sauce to the goose, the new kid on the block is the
> CIHT chemistry, a mysterious catalyst compound allegedly capable of
> performing direct electrical conversion when it's allowed to catalyze
> under appropriate conditions.
>
> But then, we are all human, and to be human is to occasionally error.
>
> I obviously don't expect you to know the answer to these conundrums.
> However, regarding your comments:
>
> > The in between half orbital states exist as point of
> > electromagnetic and gravitomangeitc continuity.
> > The continity is on the order of one.
> >
> > Unless we take these areas of continuity as shrunken,
> > we have no shrunken atoms.
>
> Are you possibly referring to muonium interaction? Is your theories
> compatible with their observed behavior?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon
>
> Regards
> Steven Vincent Johnson
> www.OrionWorks.com
> www.zazzle.com/orionworks
>
>
