Yeah, okay, people have known about the Mono Lake bacteria for a while now. But the latest paper in Science reports progress in understanding the bacteria, and culturing it in the lab. It is an important development. It is worthy of a NASA press conference. I think it does enhance the possibilities of other life in the universe and maybe even in the Solar System, which is awe inspiring. I say kudos to the authors and NASA.

See the review in New Scientist:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19805-arseniceating-bacteria-point-to-new-life-forms.html

Interesting quote:

"Despite surviving on arsenic for a year, the bacteria would still "prefer" to grow using phosphorous: biomolecules react more efficiently in water and seem to be more stable when constructed with phosphorous than arsenic. They only substitute arsenic if there is no alternative."

That doesn't surprise me, but I'll bet that a life form evolving in the presence of arsenic that uses it from the get-go would not have this tendency. Biological system are incredibly resilient and they often want to return to their own pre-defined norm, sort of like plastic toothpaste tubes with a memory for the shape. Or cold fusion reactions which, as Pons said, have a kind of memory and want to return to the previous power level after someone interrupts them. (Skeptics mocked him for saying this, but many chemical reactions such as fire in a burning log do the same thing so I don't see why they doubted it. If the NAE is unaltered, why wouldn't the reaction return to the same level of activity?)

- Jed

Reply via email to