Dear Rich. Have you seen the brand new patent -published *just in time* (January 13) WO 20110005506 "Method and apparstus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exotermal reaction" inventor Andrea Rossi?
Peter On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Rich Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > A new energy source from nuclear fusion, S Focardi, A Rossi, 9p text > 2010.03.22: Rich Murray 2011.01.14 > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf > 9 pages > > A new energy source from nuclear fusion > S. Focardi (1) > and A. Rossi (2) > (1) Physics Department Bologna University and INFN Bologna Section > (2) Leonardo Corp. (USA) - Inventor of the Patent > March 22, 2010 > > Abstract > > A process (international patent publication N. WO 2009/125444 A1) > capable of producing large amounts of energy by a nuclear fusion process > between nickel and hydrogen, occurring below 1000 K, is described. > Experimental values of the ratios between output and input energies > obtained in a certain number of experiments are reported. > The occurrence of the effect is justified on the basis of existing > experimental and theoretical results. > Measurements performed during the experiments allow to exclude > neutron and gamma rays emissions. > > The patented apparatus is able of producing a constant and reliable > amount of energy for a period of months. > > Two different samples of material used in the experiments labelled in table > 1 as method A (288 kWh produced) and method B (4774 kWh produced) > were analysed at Padua University SIMS. > In the long period sample, the mass analysis showed the presence of > three peaks in the mass region 63-65 a.m.u. > which correspond respectively to Cu 63, elements (Ni 64 and Zn 64) > deriving from Cu 64 decay and Cu 65. > These allowed us the determination of the ratio Cu 63/Cu 65=1,6 > different from the value (2,24) relative to the copper isotopic natural > composition. > The peak in the mass spectrum at a.m.u.=64, due to Ni 64 > and Zn 64 (both caming from Cu 64 decay) > requires the existence of Ni 63 which, > absent in natural Ni composition, must have been in precedence > produced starting by more light nickel isotopes. > More details on this analysis will be given in a successive paper [8]. > > 6. email address > [email protected] > [email protected] > >
