Here is an interesting comment from the Russian discussion. Apparently,
Rossi told someone not to use a particle detector. This person thinks
that means the reaction is not difficult to suss out with a detect.
QUOTE Google Translation:
In general, if we assume that all this is true, it is interesting to
consider this in any direction. Sooner or later it becomes known that
inside the reactor, and therefore could be to reproduce it. Russia
[PROBABLY SHOULD BE ROSSI] even forbade the use of spectrometers,
explaining that once all becomes clear, then there is nothing daunting
to play there.
Patents - it's all good when we are talking about legitimate, open
production. Patented a sewing needle - receive income from it. Any
manufacturer will have to pay their contributions, or - the court. But
with the cold fusion a few different story, in my opinion. There are
already connected and the interests of huge corporations. Take, for
example, China. It is clear that a country like no other is interested
in cheap energy. Who can stop them build a bunch of these reactors in
the country? Any vessels they might get scared? In extreme cases,
organize underground bunkers, which no one will know.
Some technical details of the experiment from a professor Observer
(English): http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MacyMspecificso.pdf
In short - everything is correct, water is converted into dry steam
(separate tracks), the mass of hydrogen is not reduced (chemical
reactions not). K-HT output to the input power: 31. The seriousness of
the approach said that 2 weeks was calibrated water pump and a professor
saw to it that no one touched the pump after that and the volume of
water is not changed. . . .
- Jed
