On 01/22/2011 02:41 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: > True, Robin, but Cold Fusion was D + D fusion, this one cannot be > Peter
Stuff and nonsense. That's like saying 'thermonuclear fusion is D + T so when Li fuses, later in the chain, it's not thermonuclear fusion." > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:05 AM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:40:13 +0200: > Hi, > [snip] > >The DN paper is an exercise in logical fallacies. And it shows > how facts can > >be ignored. Only the press says that what happened is cold fusion > >i.e. fusion at cold, due to its (the press') inherent > sensationalism. The > >world is infinitely interesting, the press wants to describe it > as even more > >interesting. But Rossi has told that what takes place in his > device is NOT > >cold fusion. > > Any reaction that joins atomic nuclei together is fusion. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > >
