>From Jed and Rossi: >> Jed: >> I know many people who would be happy to pay for the additional >> demonstration units, and any other costs associated with them.
> From Rossi: > Dear Jed, > As I already said, my next public appearence will be to introduce > the 1 MW plant, because: > > C = 1/D^2 > > Wherein: > C = moles of chattering > D= Dimensions of the reactors > Warm regards, > A.R. > Wherein: > A = Andrea > R = Rossi >> Well, he has a sense of humor anyway. >> "Wherein: A = Andrea, R = Rossi" Having worked extensively with a similar algebraic algorithm, 1/r^2, in simulating the mysterious behavior of orbiting bodies, as governed by the laws of Celestial Mechanics, I would have to say that Rossi makes a valid point - regardless of how humorously creative the conclusion may seem to most of us. ;-) OTOH, me-thinks it's easy to maintain the appearance of magnanimousness when one is under the assumption that they are calling the shots. Speaking of scientific analysis, has Rossi ever said anything of pertinence about allowing independent analysis of the copper his Ni + H reactors are alleged to produce? More to the point, has anyone SEEN the copper??? Surely Rossi MUST have samples laying about the lab. As Jones astutely stated not too long, analysis of the Ni / Cu ratio would probably in itself establish authenticity beyond all reasonable shadow of doubt. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
