Hi Terry, Yes, but I'm not sure what, if anything, you are implying!
The difference is that several of these groups are NOT doing this as part of the academic, peer-reviewed community, so if your implying that this is bad or improper, then I'd have to disagree. Some are coming at it more as engineers who are trying to optimize the effect w/o really having a theoretical understanding... I suppose some groups may have some kind of physical model, a working hypothesis, but not necessarily. Others may not... They just perform tests in a methodical manner and determine which parameters work and which don't, or what range of parameters work... I've had to do this myself. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Robert E. Godes claims theory and device for .1 MHz AC to drive H2O electrolysis next to Ni or Pd [ wires?], so protons become 4 neutron particles and then He with heat, no local lattice damage, no radiation, no radioactives, 200 C, 129 atm On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > Or, the Rossi demo has caused these other groups feel like its time to > make their presence known. > Which is what got F&P into a premature news conference. T
