On 02/09/2011 01:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > Of course this method of direct temperature control via the included > hardware is what is being done, and it is not speculation! >
Who, besides yourself, has said the reaction rate is being electrically controlled to keep the steam temperature at 101.6 C? > > > The possibility of control via water flow is ABSURD! Where did that > come from? > It was a bad joke which got taken seriously. I was trying to show how outrageous the coincidence of input and output power was if there was no feedback mechanism.
