>
>From: Horace Heffner <[email protected]>
>To: Vortex-L <[email protected]>
>Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 1:54:00 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results
>I think the notion of super heavy electrons suppressing gammas and other
>neuron
>activation radiation, especially delayed neutron activation gammas, is totally
>non credible. If it were credible we could create a film with heavy electrons
>in
>
>it, say by initiating the subject reaction conditions, and then
>simultaneously
>sending a beam of gammas through the film to see how much the gamma
>attenuation
>
>actuaally changes. Not enough to be of any practical consequence I expect!
>If
>so then this would prove the WL theory completely wrong.
-----------------
Don't you think Nagel gives some fatuous reasons for not even mentioning the
W-L
theory at the current ICCF conference?
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/10/american-%e2%80%9ccold-fusion%e2%80%9d-authorities-exclude-colleagues-research/
An experimentalist at the conference won't perform a test of the W-L unless
they
hear more about the theory.
Or is it strictly the job of the theorist to first propose tests of their own
theory before it is taken seriously by an experimentalist?
harry
