on Sat, 19 Feb 2011 07:20 Jones Beene wrote
[snip] It is a dimensional thing. Dense hydrogen only accumulates in two dimensions. After it accumulates, it may move in 3-space as a bound unit, but the effect would be similar to the way Mills' describes the 'orbitsphere' which is 2D but encompassing 3-space as a "wrap-around", essentially.[/snip] ok but "moving in 3 space" as a "bound" unit would be in conflict with your notion that only atoms can make the translation to different fractional or pycno states (go figure.) OR Are you saying the "bound unit" is a different kind of atomic bond? a.temporal bond?!?! My pet theory remains that covalent bonds oppose the transition but if not close enough to disassociation can migrate into the lattice like wound springs ready to disassociate at a discount, just add heat BUT the "confines" of the lattice keep them cold (deuterium ice being an apt name). In the past I had assumed a runaway ashless chemical reaction occurring in the cavities but have recently realized that a catalyst is a combination of lattice and defects and like a nanotube would have no catalytic action without the defects and openings.. I may be stating the obvious but catalytic action appears to be based on the CHANGE in nano geometry - a repeating lattice may afford some change from the perspective of a proton (normal loading) but I think you need defects and cavities to really take advantage of a lattice by condensing whole atoms and molecules such that they can migrate into the confines of the lattice (loading of fractional gas molecules). The most powerful skeletal catalysts have the most pores /greatest surface area which IMHO is proportional to the loading ratio of f/he to normal protons in the lattice. Life after death is just the leaching out of fh2 which must translate between different fractional states by disassociating and reassociating as it migrates to the boundaries of the bulk material. Also "After it accumulates, it may move in 3-space as a bound unit" has shades of reshaping space-time To allow atoms bound on a "different" 3D than ours or a different angle to retain their orientation While interacting with our inertial frame. I think it still needs the lattice or extreme cold to maintain This orientation but I am convinced that from their own perspective these atoms are perfectly normal in size and bonding methods and it is a change in energy density / inertial frame effected by the nano geometry that Is responsible for what we perceive as pycno, fractiona or relativistic hydrogen. [snip]Now let me backtrack - it is possible that time itself is also distorted in 2D, but that is not part of picture, at least not so far. [/snip] Ok, I may be alone in this.for now but so many clues point to a temporal connection it can't be long Before others see how it brings the puzzle pieces together. You have papers where C is faster inside a cavity And this is for a measurement of photons which spend only the briefest period traversing the cavity compared to atoms of gas which can occupy and accumulate dilation inside the cavity. You have known variations in radioactive half life and delays in spontaneous emission when there is obviously no spatial acceleration anywhere near C. You have Naudts proposal that these hydrogen atoms are relativistic with the same lack of spatial displacement And then you have the curious theory for Casimir effect that claims longer flux are displaced and only shorter flux can fit between casimir plates to explain a lower energy density While a relativistic interpretation would better explain the same effect while also addressing the time dilations seen in radioactive half lives. We also know that time slows from our perspective for an object in a deep gravity well equivalent to an object approaching a spatial velocity of C - both methods result in an increased energy density from the perspective of our inertial frame but all observers and objects are unaware of any change locally. My premise is the cavity Supplies an "equivalent" form of modification to energy density similar to the building of a gravity well by mass but accelerating the process through suppression with the added ability to "segregate" and concentrate the total density. For instance if the plates of a cavity accumulate 4g/large-area and the tiny cavity dissipates That 4g down to 3g then the cavity is not a negative 1g but rather a negative 1g / (plate area/cavity opening) Regards Fran
