The Larsen & Windom Patent on gamma shielding: "Apparatus and method for absorption of incident gamma radiation and its conversion to outgoing radiation at less penetrating, lower energies and frequencies ":

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser? Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch- bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7893414.PN.&OS=PN/ 7893414&RS=PN/7893414

http://tinyurl.com/47al74f

was heralded by NET:

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/22/cold-fusioneers-complain- lenr-researchers-patent/

http://tinyurl.com/46zgbfu

It is notable that, despite the huge amount of content on cold fusion and LENR, it is not a patent on a nuclear energy production method, merely a gamma shielding method.

Also, unless I missed it, there does not seem to be any test data provided in the patent proving the method works. It would seem sending a gamma beam through such thin shielding material and *measuring* attenuation would be the minimal level of proof required to show that the theory is not completely bogus.

Again the authors make the absurd claim that "cold fusion" reactions do not encompass weak reactions: "Together, the four scientific papers by the present inventors comprising Attachments 1-4 can explain all of the major features exhibited in many seemingly anomalous experiments (lumped under the unfortunate term cold fusion) that have previously been regarded by many as theoretically inexplicable. In contrast to other earlier theories involving penetration of Coulomb barriers, the present Invention's methods and apparatus for creating low energy nuclear reactions are scientifically reasonable within the context of the well-accepted standard model of electroweak interaction physics. The key process responsible for producing most of the experimentally observed anomalies explained by these publications is not any form of cold fusion, nor is it any form of fission. On the contrary, the key physical processes driving the unique behavior of these systems are primarily weak interactions."

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to