Abd Lomax is devoting much time and effort to enable anyone to prove neutron emissions with a small, low-cost deuterium-palladium electrolysis cell. I suggest he supply a weekly post on his progress, sharing all data immediately real-time, including full high-resolution views of both sides of the sensitive plastic. Why not share duplicates of his first cell with other researchers -- Ludwik Kowalski, Scott Little, Pam Boss? Could more such scientists form a common public website for this single device?
I'll treat you to a meal, if you show up in Santa Fe: Rich Murray 505-819-7388 [email protected] 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe, NM 87505 On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>Like or not, unless another experimenter or group - more open to >>>> disclosure > of the operational details, can approximate the Rossi results of extremely > high COP at the kilowatt level, in the next few months leading up to the > promised MW demonstration, then it is going to be a frustrating period for > LENR researchers at many levels. > > I agree there needs to be an independent replication of the device that > offers an "open demo". > I fear that if Rossi fails to produce a 1MW system by Sept then the field > will be harmed. > I am working on a path similar to Rossi (high temp gas loading) but with > only sporadic and inconsistent results. > I do have the capability to work up to 1 or 2 kW with ease and higher with a > little modification. > > I would be happy to receive help in an effort to replicate the Rossi system. > I am talking actual physical support not talk or money. - material > preparation, machining,... > Please let me know if anyone finds out exactly what Rossi is using and the > conditions. > Let me know if anyone wishes to join forces. > > I feel we are at a "tipping point". Either Rossi is correct and things will > develop quickly, or he is > wrong and there will be great damage to the field. Someone somewhere needs > to do an independent > replication or at least an attempt - hopefully with Rossi's blessings , but > it needs to be done. > A replication would need to be completely "open" to serious investigators. > I am welcome to the idea of an "open lab"..... (within reason) > My guess is that Rossi will to busy between now and Sept to do such a thing > himself. > > Dennis Cravens > >
