I will ask Daniele who was there. We have the registration of the demo, do you think the ultra-sound component got lost if it were there? or can we detect it in some way? Peter
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > that's great... always prefer to get the scoop from a direct observer. > > Back to the point of my email... can you or Prof. Levi answer Jones' > question: > "Does anyone recall an audible component to the demo (other than the pump > sloshing) which could be indicative of lower harmonics of ultrasound?" > > -Mark > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:24 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is there a "SONO" connection to the Rossi Demo? > > Dear Mark, > > I have established good contacts with Daniele Passerini who writes the > reports and with Giuseppe Levi. If something interesting happens, i can ask > them, but only *answerable questions.* > **By the way the great problem now is to understand how 0.4 grams of > hydrogen can n generate 270 KWh energy. Amazing. > Peter > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Mark Iverson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Jones: >> I remember someone here saying that someone at the Jan 14 demo said they >> could hear the sound of rushing air inside the hose, and that it was routed >> thru the door and into the sink in another room nearby... that narrows it >> down, since only a few people on vortex are in contact with someone who was >> present at the demo. >> Jed, Peter??? >> >> -Mark >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1:03 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [Vo]:Is there a "SONO" connection to the Rossi Demo? >> >> In one of the photos of the Rossi demo, Levi is shown holding his ear >> as if there was a loud noise coming from the device. OTOH he could have been >> listening to an inopportune cell phone call. >> >> Does anyone recall an audible component to the demo (other than the pump >> sloshing) which could be indicative of lower harmonics of ultrasound? Of >> course, there is lead shielding which would shield for sound as well as >> radiation. >> >> The reason that this may be important is that thermistors are also >> piezoelectric (usually). >> >> We know the blue box contains five controllers, possibly an older kind of >> Allen Bradley controller, but that is a guess and not known. An expert might >> recognize the type of controller with the unusual exposed binding posts, but >> no mention of it has surfaced AFAIK. >> >> I think that the controllers drive thermistors with pulsed DC, instead of >> heating tape, which is the usual assumption. "Positive Temperature >> Coefficient" (PTC) thermistors function as self-regulating heating elements >> with only two wire input. They can work like thermocouples by sampling >> impedance in the circuit several times per second when controlled by PLCs. >> >> The point being, if this is correct, one would expect ultrasound as well. >> >> Anyway, I was calling this setup “PLC/PTC” since it could be PLCs driving >> thermistors… and now it has been realized that, if accurate, there is a >> possible new variable to the input – ultrasonics and possibly a travelling >> wave, due to five controllers, when if the requirement was only for >> temperature – one would be sufficient. Other reasons for this suggestion >> is the Energetics Technologies (Dardik) SuperWave™ and the other evidence >> of sonofusion and/or sonoluminescence. >> >> Now, back to the original question about Levi at the demo – is there >> evidence of an ultrasonic component? >> >> Jones >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
