In off line collaboration and discussions with Scott Smith we are considering nuclei as consisting of very small subatomic cavities with high suppression (opposition to flux). It is still the Puthoff model but inverted such that the nucleus is pushed much harder than the orbitals which act like tethered balls behind the nucleus. the electrons find their ground state as an equilibrium point between their electrical attraction and this constant vacuum pressure differential. Some of our arguments made me think long and hard regarding the “relative” size/length of our VP/flux wavelength. The missing point in our extension of the Puthoff model may be this “suppression” at the atomic level. The VP can not “pass through” the nuclei in the Present AND they can not deviate around the nuclei on the spatial plane so they push the nuclei into a relativistic well. The vacuum flux wavelengths in this well would appear shorter from our perspective or you could also say the canvas which the nuclei is drawn upon becomes stretched such that it allows these wavelengths to push through on their perpendicular trajectory. Puthoff hinted at this ”pressure” being different for every element in the periodic table and suppression geometry as a tool toward vacuum engineering. I do agree the physical properties of elements in the periodic chart already reflect this opposition (pressure) to streaming VP but there also accumulates SOME random unbalanced momentum that is imparted to matter on the spatial plane. For the most part this pressure accumulates to push the nucleus into the past on the time axis while stretching the fabric of space into a micro well but In the case of free floating gas atoms any imbalance of these accumulating pressure points can lead to the random motion in gas or the alignment of hydrogen bonds in water (another potential source of ZPE). I think these imbalances cancel out quickly in solids and even in the cases where these forces persist into our macro scale you still need a Heisenburg trap or Maxwells demon to exploit them. In a circus arcade contest you shoot at a target with an air powered bb machine gun – the target is on a line so the operator can pull it forward to examine and replace the target. If he didn’t send it back into position and left it nearby you could use your gun to shoot it with such force that it would “push” the target away to some equilibrium point (think ground state). If you happen to randomly target one side more than the other you could accumulate a left or right force on the target- in a solid where all the targets are connected these random forces would probably cancel out but in a gas where the targets are free floating the random force can persist. If the targets were drawn on stretchable fabric and both the projectile and target were unbreakable then you could stretch the fabric and allow the projectiles to “push through” the fabric if you concentrated enough fire power “pressure” to stretch the fabric – from our stretched fabric perspective the projectiles would appear to get smaller (up convert) and squeeze through the nucleus.
Regards Fran
