To the liberally-inclined unstable movement that is attempting to have it 
made-off the backs of others : Why is that most of the so-called people 
who're attempting to live "high like a hog" generally seem to be on-average 
about 
50-lbs overweight (no offense to those with a fat-gene)?  > Now, by all 
means I say go-out and excercise your weight, uhh, er, I mean 'right',,, to 
tell everyone you need work more, otherwise you might end-up in an early grave. 
> Now, we all know (every so often) how important it is to stand-up and use 
the mouth you were born with, and be heard (like a Herd of Steer in a 
Captial Building),,, however, if you're not careful, you may cause a 
potentially 
life-threatening disaster that may subsequently lead to your demise. > 
Tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, mudslides, floods, toreential 
rainfall, and even asteroids & comets stricking the earth, can be catastrophic, 
and be very expensive to deal with. > So, you can cleary see that by having 
some extra money, could therefore enable the rebuilding of a devastated 
community in a considerably quicker amount of time, aby which many people can 
then 
reproduce at a faster rate, thus repopulating the commmunity just in-time 
for next disaste.... it's a matter of 'survival-by-numbers'. > The way I see 
it is however is there is trouble with 'survival-by-numbers' 'perse because 
it is increasingly becoming unsustainable. > As our society continues to 
pro-gress, we are essentially working ourselves out of a job. > While many of 
us have been making a fairly good living, at the same time we have made 
ourselves become less important to our survival. > We are now making the kind 
of 
progress that essentially no-longer requires the large number of people that 
were once needed in order to survive,,, and, we all know we can't go back 
to the way things were. > AND so, as we continue to create a more enriched 
and fullfilling life, the squeeze will continue to force us to 
diminish-in-numbers, until we are essentially at some point in the future, are 
no more. > 
Survival-by-numbers' is taking-on a whole new meaning, and will someday 
no-doubt no-longer require us biologically dependent entities to breath, eat, 
compete, and/or survive (thats a good thing!). > Now, I realize what this must 
sound like, however I have little doubt that all the various issues our 
society is now confronting and/or will  in the near future, will someday ALL be 
resolved, and/or already have. > I tend to view this (human mode of being) 
situation as being analagous to when the dinosaurs roamed the earth in vast 
numbers (once upon a time) of which are now obviously extinct. > Now, thats 
not to say that they weren't here and went about the daily struggle to live, 
it's simply more a question of whether or not whether WE had a chance to see 
the results of our efforts,,,, and if we actually have the ability to 
conceive of that which makes-up this thing that we tednd to call LIFE? > 
Obviously, the dinosaurs did not possess the cognitive ability that would 
enable 
them to have any concept of what they were, and  therefore they could only do 
what their biologically dependent instinct told them to. > Now, because WE 
possess a considerably more developed cognitive ability, are we then therefore 
able to conceive of that which we currently are completely unaware of, AND, 
might we therefore alter the course we're on? > Based on what I have 
personally seen, I am convinced that we are indeed the dinosaurs,,, and I 
therefore think it is possible to alter the course we're on, IF, first & 
foremost 
more people would use more of their brain-power when they talk, instead of 
their mouth. > Please, don't get me wrong, as I am not a hypocrit because I 
know the vital importance that prosperity can enable a society to achieve, it's 
just that now that our society is having so much trouble with propsperity, 
that maybe we need to reconsider how we pro-gress from here-on. > Well, 
thats all for now, because I gotta go,,,, because I gotta go.     Loren   (a 
nonfriend of dis-extinction).  </HTML>

Reply via email to