OOPS! I meant to say . I still think there is an interim ashless step that pushes these atoms down toward the 1/137 limit before nuclear reactions are favorable.
Fran Google translation of Focardi interview [ states] There are no neutrons. Questa è una fortuna, perché essendo un fenomeno nucleare uno se li aspetta. This is fortunate, because it is a nuclear phenomenon if one is waiting for them. Per fortuna non ci sono perché il nucleo del nickel è una buca abbastanza profonda; se fosse meno profonda ci sarebbero anche i neutroni, perché negli esperimenti di Siena una volta abbiamo trovato i neutroni e li abbiamo misurati; ma erano materiali diversi dal nickel. Fortunately, there are the core of nickel because it is a "hole deep enough" if it was shallower there would also neutrons, because the experiments of Siena once we found the neutron and we have measured, but were different materials from nickel . Insomma: l'esperimento è nickel più idrogeno; si tratta di cose molto semplici... In short, the experiment is more nickel hydrogen, it is very simple things ... [/states] When he says "hole deep enough" and if it was shallower there would also neutrons he may be supporting the relativistic hydrogen model suggested by Naudts. Inside a catalyst. From our perspective the nucleus is displaced from the orbital http://www.garrityhvac.com/gwell.gif and any radiation coming from the nuclei is greatly decelerated when returning to our frame just as any physical matter gets accelerated going from our inertial frame back to the fractional states proposed for hydrogen and deuterium everything appears normal locally to the translated gas atoms including radiation from a nuclear event but if the hole is deep enough the radiation will translate into a much slower formC Below is what I believe suppression does to vacuum energy wavelengths inside a catalyst of Casimir geometry. Wavelengths only appear shorter to the observer outside the suppression IOW the larger virtual particles are not displaced they just appear smaller. http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32169/primary-objection-to-relativistic-inter pretation-of-casimir-effect/sine3/ Regards Fran
