From: "Göran Crafte" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:55:28 AM 
Subject: [Vo]:My very BIG question to Andrea Rossi 

I posted the following very BIG question to Andrea Rossi an hour ago. Maybe the 
idea is not very new to you. I'm anyway very interested in what kind of answer 
I will get, if any. What kind of answer do you think I will get? Just a simple 
"No"? 


Dear Mr Rossi, 

Do you think there might be a nuclear “evolution” going on in your reactors, in 
which heavier and heavier elements will form if they continue to be exposed to 
the special environment which you have created in your reactor? 

Couldn’t copper and other elements become heavier and more unstable the longer 
they have been in your reactor and then turn to the next, heavier element? 

Warm Regards, 
Göran Crafte 




ANSWER: 

    • 

Andrea Rossi 
April 10th, 2011 at 2:32 PM 

Dear Goran Crafte: 1- no 2- no Warm Regards, A.R. 





ALSO: 




    • 

William 
April 9th, 2011 at 10:18 AM 

Mr. Andrea Rossi, 

What do you mean by the last part of this statement? 

“The treatment of the powders is part of the invention and is confidential so 
far: the difficult part of it stays in the low operational cost.” 

Is it difficult to keep the processing cost low? 

Is the processing of the nickel powder an expensive process? 

How much does the processing add to the cost of the nickel? 

One final question: Can you state for the record that no part of the copper 
tubing enters the reactor vessel? 

Thank you again for being willing to answer so many questions. In the minds of 
many people I know this adds tremendously to your credibility. Your openness is 
FAR different than some other researchers who did not openly discuss their 
technology. 

Sincerely, William 


    • 

Andrea Rossi 
April 9th, 2011 at 3:27 PM 

Dear Mr William: 1- I wanted to say that to treat the powders is confidential 
because difficult 2- the Ni processing system increases 10% the cost of Ni 3- 
Cu cannot enter the reactor: Cu is what the water tube is made of, inside the 
water tube there is the reactor, which is tightly sealed. Warm regards, A.R. 


    • 

Andrea Rossi 
April 9th, 2011 at 7:45 AM 

Dear Mr Jason Le Leivre: In teir own turn all the modules are maintained every 
6 months. We put 10 more modules than necessary, so that while 10 modules are 
in maintainance the plant remains in full operation. Warm Regards, A.R. 

Reply via email to