Jones,
I was in fact preparing a similar thread but yours put mine to
shame. I would however remind you of Focardi's radio interview
Where he states :
[snip] There are no neutrons. Fortunately, there are the core of nickel
because it is a "hole deep enough" if it was shallower there would also
neutrons, because the experiments of Siena once we found the neutron and we
have measured, but were different materials from nickel .... In short, the
experiment is more nickel hydrogen, it is very simple things ... [/snip]
When Focardi says the core of nickel fortunately provides a "hole deep
enough" and if it "was shallower" there would also be neutrons he is
referring to the Casimir geometry and nuclear reactions being shielded down
inside a hole that Naudts has proposed is relativistic - Note when Naudts
suggested a relativistic solution for the hydrino inside of Mill's skeletal
catalyst he wasn't referring to the high velocity hydrogen being ejected by
the sun but rather he was referring to very low velocity hydrogen inside a
skeletal catalyst - IOW an equivalent form of hydrino. Just like gravity is
an equivalent form of acceleration. It is the formation of Casimir geometry
in the skeletal catalyst or nano powders that provide this relativistic
environment. Just like a large mass provides gravity, the large surface area
outside of a cavity also accumulates gravity but at an accelerated rate
across because of the suppression of longer vacuum energy wavelength inside
the cavity walls. This possibly explains the Reifenschweiler effect as an
"exterior" Casimir time dilation effect while more importantly it creates a
resivoir of vacuum energy to dump inside the cavity opening causing greatly
accelerated time dilation. This difference in energy density forms a
permanent vortex when the hole is small enough that the accumulated pressure
differential cannot exhaust itself faster than the accumulation rate. What
Puthoff refers to as vacuum engineering then becomes possible because your
environment now provides abrupt changes in energy density for any mobile
reactants - allowing you to exploit chemical reactions in different
environments and create asymmetries courtesy of gas law which provides a
random motive force - the trick was a direct rectification would have fallen
prey to the random directionalization of the gas molecules. IMHO the
disassociation threshold sidesteps this issue because it only depends on
temp and catalytic action so regardless of which way the molecules get
pushed the local Casimir geometry is likely to change and force a
disassociation -ushually synchronized with the current pulse of the
resistive heaters Pulse width - the point being more molecules are
disassociated during the pulse than can be accounted for by the energy of
the pulse. If you can extract that heat fast enough for these atoms to
reform molecules before the next pulse then you can repeat this procedure
endlessly- effectively creating a Heisenberg trap for ZPE using the bond
states of gas atoms as a rectifier.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:47: Jones Beene wrote
[snip]Why the temperature window, in a range where there is no phase-change
in
titanium? Why the return to normality at higher temperature? How much
reduction occurs when going from 15 nm down to 5 nm? Does the effect work
with either Pd and Ni, or is it specific to Ti? Is the effect related to
HTSC in some mysterious way ? More questions than answers, as of now.[/snip]
IMHO this lesser time dilation is an "exterior" Casimir effect where the
outside of Casimir plates accumulates a large shallow
Reservoir of energy density faster than normal mass because of the
suppression process on the inside of cavity plates.
it helps to feed the tiny opening into the cavity such that the difference
in energy density can't exhaust itself and therefore forms a permanent
vortex for us to exploit. That different radioactive gases experience
different types of time dilation may reflect their
natural properties WRT different migration patterns in a catalytic
environment where the Reifenschweiler claims would be for gases that
favor zones outside the cavities while radioactive decays that appear to be
accelerated would be for gases who's properties favor migration inside
Casimir geometry.
Jones also said [snip] Does it help to know that a laser pulse can make a
radioactive isotope decay
much faster than normal ?[snip]
I can't add to that but on a "Laser" related note, I know that a laser beam
shot through a Casimir cavity is measured from our perspective as being
slightly faster than C. I guess the beam would have to be circulated
millions of time for this to accumulate into anything meaningful but it does
support the connection between a change in energy density with time
dilation. A gas atom that lingers in this environment far longer than a
laser beam accumulates a much larger time dilation and can migrate into even
smaller much more suppressed geometry than the straight line route required
to measure the laser beam.
Regards
Fran
