The missing Gamma radiation in the Rossi demo and comments by Focardi has me revisiting the assumed lack of isolation between dimensions. We know from the twin paradox that
People and objects in different inertial frame are locally unaware of their vector angle between time and space and any resulting time dilations can only be perceived by comparison to a different inertial frame. If we rewrite the twin paradox using tiny pico scale twins and instead of using deep gravity wells to provide equivalent acceleration (increased vacuum energy density) we instead use Casimir cavities to create a Tall gravity hill/warp (decreased vacuum energy density) we get the “Casimir version of twin paradox”. In this version of the paradox we have one twin that remains at our normal energy density outside the cavity (the reference twin”) and the other twin who ventures deep into the tiniest geometry where energy density is far less than outside the cavity due to suppression. If the “Casimir twin” remains in the low density environment for 10 years before returning from the cavity he will find his “reference” twin hasn’t aged and only a few minutes have elapsed from the reference twins perspective. Effectively the Casimir twins metabolism and lab equipment were operating much faster down in the cavity from our perspective. Any test waveforms or chemical reactions performed while inside the cavity are equally slowed down during the return leg back to our reference energy density. If gamma radiation is produced inside the cavity it must also be slowed down as it transitions upward in energy density. My point is the Gamma radiation must translate to lower less harmful Frequency from our perspective just as the Casimir twin’s aging process must decline back toward normal as he “comes back up” – this gamma radiation was not created at our rate of time outside the cavity – it was created at a much lower energy density and therefore will become “slow gamma” as it “comes up” to our energy density. This is what Focardi is referring to when he says "hole deep enough" and “ if it was shallower there would also be neutrons”. Regards Fran
