Concerning my ZPE inventions. I have been advised by an attorney that the best protection from infringement is to start by issuing inexpensive licenses that expire. Make it cheaper to pay for a license than for a lawsuit to try, perhaps unsuccessfully to steal it. These licenses can be renewed for ever-increasing amounts as resources build to more aggressively charge for licenses, because at that point you can out-litigate most comers and can settle, making special arrangements whenever there is danger of an adverse ruling. In this manner you can build preferable precedents. My only hesitation in taking this device is, ironically, it is better for the public to charge almost as much for the payments on the device as they are already paying for energy----Please listen!!! If they immediately have virtually free energy, but no new goods and services have been already developed, the economy will feel the extra money; this will cause inflation. In other words, people will simply take the money they were already spending on energy and have to spend that same-amount more on all the other things they are already buying. Instead, if they are making payments on their home generator. There is an end in sight---they will eventually have free energy. Meanwhile new goods and services will be created as the bulk of their payments is reinvested in creating entirely new products and services. They will get the money back almost immediately as the economy grows. My technology leads to inexpensive, rapid Space Travel, inexpensive mineral resources from Space. Oil producing nations can switch to industries that use now-cheap plastic. Plastic will become as cheap or cheaper than what we pay for petroleum now. One of my goals is to replace today's throwaway economy with truly durable goods to take the strain off of the environment. Automation is the next big advance. The energy money can help finance a way to make sure that everyone gains equity in the auto-fabricators since any remaining need for labor is completely outstripped by the supply. So many or most of us can work far less and have far more---even those in the "third world." We can produce unlimited food, underground or in skyscrapers, now that the power is cheap. Check out my system to cut special interests completely out of politics. ScottWm. Scott Smithz-pec.yolasite.com Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:24:36 +0300 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why we should continue studying other modes of cold fusion (in a few years) From: peter.gl...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
I am an engineer have 40 years practice in chemical industry and I was professor of Management of Technology for 3 years in a school of Ecomanagement for directors, managers. Therefore I am not ready to believe such an statement - why exactly 2.5 Kw and not 1.8 or 3.2? I am sure Rossi can manufacture even bonsai kittens (do you remember the hoax?) but this is not an essential question. I have a vivid empathy for Rossi , he has solved a vital problem at a really high level. He has lots of problems- development, patent with no connection with the prior art, secrecy, the danger of competion, the bad publicity of cold fusion,scale-up, lack of theory, denialism of new energy, the possibility of reverse engineering of his devices and so on.You have shown that his commercial development strategy is perhaps not optimal.I think it is my/our duty to help the technology and to understand the position of the man Rossi. peter On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: >From practical reasons, Rossi does not manufacture generators smaller than 2.5 >kW but I don't see any reasons they cannot be much smaller. I do not see any reason either, but a few days ago he said the minimum size is 2.5 kW. I do not think he meant it would be impractical; I gather he meant it is impossible. He probably has a reason for saying that. We will see whether that reason is valid or invalid. Rossi says many things which seem strange or baseless; i.e. without a reason. Many people have concluded that he does not really mean what he says; he is playing some sort of mind game; or a deception similar to what Ching-Wu Chu was accused of doing when he told people his formula had Yb (ytterbium) instead of Y (yttrium). I recommend you reserve judgement and not try to read his mind. I do not know why he says these things, and more to the point, I do not know whether these things are true or false. Nobody knows. It is likely they are mixture of true and false. Rossi has a highly original, bold, and idiosyncratic world view. He also has idiosyncratic ways of expressing himself. So does Arata. As I said, he often makes up strange new words to describe concepts that already have conventional words. Such people often discover new facts about nature that seem crazy to the rest of us. They also often make gigantic mistakes, that we would never make because we are too timid, and too conventional. We can too easily jump to the conclusion that such people are dissembling. It is better to reserve judgement and reach no conclusions for now. - Jed -- Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
