On 2011-04-15 16:04, Jed Rothwell wrote:
But Peter Gluck wrote: ". . . one word is missing: 'technological.'"
What do you mean by "missing word"? Did Focardi say this and it is
missing from the translation? Or did he fail to say this and he should
have?
He didn't say that in the interview and in retrospect he should have.
I don't believe he really thinks there haven't been positive results
from Pd-D LENR research, he was more referring to their scale. In that
sense he is somewhat right that the difference between those and
his/Rossi's is so large that in practical terms other researchers
haven't got anything so far.
You see that he is outspoken and he says all kinds of things, including
stuff better left unsaid. Maybe he was just exaggerating, or mouthing
off. It is hard to believe he does not know there have been positive
results from palladium.
It was a very informal interview on a local radio station (located in
Bologna) with people that he already knew and already invited him a few
times in the past months. Focardi probably didn't expect that an
international audience would dissect it word by word, so he spoke
without filters as he, reportedly, usually does.
Cheers,
S.A.
