Axil, Apparently you failed to read or understand Peter’s comment.

 

ONCE AGAIN, IRON OXIDE IS REDUCED IN HOT HYDROGEN.

 

It is that simple. There is no Fe2O3 – at least not in pressurized hydrogen
at this temperature. There can be metallic iron present, and yes, Fe was
seen in the Swedish report.

 

There are other oxides which can be stable to varying degrees in this
reactor, but not iron. Zirconium oxide is stable in hot hydrogen - and Zr is
seen in the spectrographs of the patent application. 

 

It is possible that metallic iron, deposited on zirconia would function in
the way you are imagining, and will be catalytic, but this calls for
experimental proof or at least some indication from the literature that it
can work this way. 

 

You may or may not be aware that two oxygen atoms can function together as a
Mills’ catalyst, and that iron also is a Mills’ catalyst - and that would
make this finding of iron very relevant to our understanding. 

 

That is why I have mentioned above that metallic iron, deposited on zirconia
could function in an active way, by temporarily “borrowing” oxygen from
zirconia (very short time frame) - and thus will be catalytic in a
transitory way that would be highly temperature dependent. Surface effects
and interfaces are extremely important in catalysis.

 

Why would magnetism be important? It could be, but if so, then why doesn’t
Rossi add an external solenoid? Long before iron reaches its Curie point,
the field is strongly attenuated. Please build a prima facie case for this
kind of thing before jumping to irrelevant conclusions.

 

The bogosity level of some of these comments is reaching an extreme… We
simply cannot ignore 200 years of physics in order to convert this inventor
into some kind of messiah figure. 

 

Sure physics is incomplete, and understanding this device will involve new
physics, but please try to keep the probability levels for that manageable
by ditching the nonsense about natural isotopes deriving from a LENR
process. That is beyond bogus.

 

Jones

 

 

 

 

From: Axil Axil [

Subject: [Vo]:The mechanism behind the fail safe nature of the Rossi
process.

 

The mechanism behind the fail safe nature of the Rossi process.

 

I believe that the magnetic property of Fe2O3 in a key part of the Rossi
process and is the way that the Rossi process achieves failsafe operation. .


 

When the temperature of the catalyst get to about 577C (the Néel
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A9el_temperature>  point)  the Fe2O3
nano-particle loses its magnetic organization and the nuclear heat
production slows. The Rossi will tend to reach a temperature equilibrium at
about 600C more or less and avoid a run away meltdown . 

 

 

Reply via email to