I'm still having trouble reconciling the reported numbers for the Feb test http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm and http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece
From: "Jed Rothwell" (in the calorimetry thread) In that case, in the Feb. 10 test, when input power was 80 W, the water temperature would have risen only 0.02 °C. It did not do that. It rose 5 °C during most of the test, which proves the machine was producing 16 kW, and 31 °C during an 18-minute segment, proving the machine was producing 130 kW. > an 18-minute segment Where did you get that number? It's not in your original news report, and the nyteknik report just says: Initially, the temperature of the inflowing water was seven degrees Celsius and for a while the outlet temperature was 40 degrees Celsius. A flow rate of about one liter per second, equates to a peak power of 130 kilowatts. The power output was later stabilized at 15 to 20 kilowatts. That's 40 - 7 = 33 °C In News the temperature is reported as: Cooling water input temperature: 15°C Cooling water output temperature: ~20°C There's also a discrepancy in Levi's January report : http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdf Fig 3 shows the input temperature T1 as 17.20 -- but he uses 15 in the calculation (in the eCAT's favor): > The water inlet temperature was 15°C so the ΔT was 85°C.
