If you will ask my opinion about the issue - I will say that the two processes are different and independent. Amd there will be no World court case. But please be nice and don't ask, I belong to a non-prophet association. Peter
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Very clear! > > > > And exactly what anyone would expect at this stage of the game from both > Mills and Rossi, no ? > > > > ‘Never show your hand too soon’ if it is a poker game. > > > > When the issue gets to the World court in a few years, *Mills vs. > Defkalion* - I hope that someone will remember this. > > > > BTW, this is one more reason why kibitzers who are trying to sort out the > details should be using the term “f/H” (fractional hydrogen) for the > species, since Mills has trademarked the hydrino name. Alternatively “pycno” > or “hydrogen clusters” or “inverted Rydberg hydrogen” (IRH) all express the > differing shadows of the same object on the wall of Plato’s cave. > > > > > > *From:* Peter Gluck > > > > Dr. Randell Mills has a message to those who try to > > connect in anyway his work with that of Rossi: > > > > To me any intentional inference to hydrinos is a scam to copycat the > legitimate systems of BLP’s work. > > Please make it clear to anyone that you are in contact with that I believe > that any implied association with hydrinos is a scam. I have no > responsibility to anyone in this matter. > > > > Quite clear, isn't it? > > Just to remind you that Rossi has said that his system has nothing to do > with hydrinos. > > > > Peter > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > > Cluj, Romania > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
