On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25, Axil Axil
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
“With temperature above the set the reactor is automatically stopped”
Axil,
We see the Mill’s powder in the Rowan confirmations totally
run-away but yet we get mixed messages about the Rossi reactor which IMHO may
reflect the bond state of the gas population. It seems counter-intuitive but
instead of just throttling back this Rossi type of reaction we MUST remove
heat, not only to store the energy gain but it seems we have to cool the
disassociated atoms enough that nature takes over and they reform molecules
allowing us to repeat the cycle over and over again. I am not saying the
reaction stops without cooling but only that it slows itself down proportional
to the population that is in molecular form. The random motion of gas relative
to Casimir geometry changes the energy density being experienced by the gas
molecules. Atoms are simply reoriented by this change in energy density but
those atoms sharing covalent bonds (molecules) are held by the covalent bond
in the same orientation they possessed when the molecule formed. This
"pressure" the covalent bond feels when energy density changes discounts the
energy needed to disassociate the molecule such that it can occur at a much
lower temperature - when these atoms later re-form a new molecule they release
the full energy associated with hydrogen atoms dropping to the lower molecular
energy state including even the energy contributed in the previous cycle from
the combination of gas motion and change in energy density. We are getting a
full refund for a purchase discounted by the constant motion of gas.
Fran
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of .:.gotjosh
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 6:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:If Rossi could speak freely, what would he say.
Thanks for this post Axil, i have some comments and questions below...
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25, Axil Axil
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
“With temperature above the set the reactor is automatically stopped”
It the temperature continues to rise above another set point, the control box
releases the hydrogen gas into the water loop piping though the controlled
opening of an electrically controlled valve. This action vents excess heat to
the outside environment and serves to depress the reaction.
in my design i will prefer bimetal valves for solid state non-electronic
control if possible.
eg: http://www.emsclad.com/examples/thermal-controls.html
“How much would the temperature of the metal rise?”
The nickel oxide powder will have a substantial amount of hydrogen stored in
the lattice interstices at the surface of the nickel oxide powder where the
oxygen has been depleted by the erosive action of hydrogen impingement at the
surface or into the surface to some depth of the powder.
What do you say the previous question(s) about H2O production between H2 and
the O from NiO ?
When the heat sink of the water coolant is removed, this nuclear reaction in
the lattice interstices will continue until the temperature of at the surface
of the powder reaches the melting point of nickel. The lattice interstices will
begin to close as nickel migrate to these lattice interstices sites displacing
the absorbed hydrogen gas.
“Will the nuclear reaction stop due to high temperatures or will it be
enhanced?”
With some number of these heat producing sites disabled, the temperature at the
surface of the reaction vessel will stabilize and slowly begin to fall.
So you think it is totally self regulating in a melt down situation? and the
electronically controlled valves are only to prevent the meltdown?
This leaves open the possibility for the use of thorium in the internal heater.
Thorium has been used in vacuum tubes for many years with no radiation danger.
How confident are you about the tungsten vs nichrome question for element
material? is SiC another reasonable possibility? Or is it too dangerous to have
any C around?
Can you further explain the potential benefit of Thorium?
Finally, I have a question about the radiation shielding layers... if the
reactor is operating between 400 and 600C optimally, how can the lead shielding
remain solid? or if the borated water solution is used, won't that vaporize?
thanks to you all for your insightful contributions and engagement.
