Robin recently brought up an important speculative issue pertaining to the
available supply of nickel on our planet. If one assumes a worst case
scenario it's possible we might only have a 100 year supply. [For the sake
of argument, let's temporarily remove the premise of mining the asteroid
belt for unlimited supplies of nickel! I'll follow-up with a different post
on that matter.] 

Granted, I gather, Robin's estimate was deliberately engineered to be
conservative - primarily to stress the point that without more information
it would be wise to error on the conservative side - until we know more
about what Rossi's e-cats really "transmute".

I would love to hear various opinions on the matter of available supplies of
Nickel, particularly pertaining to the economy of actually mining the
element. How realistic of a "conservative" prediction is the 100 year
prediction? What economics are involved?

What do others think & speculate on this matter?

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks 

Reply via email to