If there is no tritium, then there is no need for tritium regulation. If the Rossi reactor does not produce tritium, then it does not require regulation. If its does not produce tritium then the Rossi reaction would be a different type of reaction manifest than other cold fusion reactions.
Non radioactive tritium would be something new, something never seen before, and something to contend with. This new isotope might start a new field of material science in its own right. IMHO,the gaseous isotope production of the Rossi reactor has not yet been determined. Until these gas isotope products are established, commercialization of the Rossi reactor cannot proceed. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You are completely off base, Axil. Do you not know Mills’ work at all? > > > > It is NOT nuclear. There is NO tritium. There is NO problem with any > regulation. > > > > Please – for you own edification, do your homework and read and learn CQM > before making silly comments like this. > > > > Jones > > > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Your caviler attitude toward conforming to the world wide nuclear > regulatory infrastructure is counterproductive to the commercialization of > cold fusion. > > This attitude worries and saddens me. > > > > > > >
