In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:03:44 -0700
[snip] ...but AFAIK gas motion is not primarily ZPE driven. It's just the
thermal
energy of the molecules. So the implication would seem to be that as the
energy
was extracted, the gas would get colder, until it reached the point where
the
temperature is maintained by the ZPE (absolute zero?). [/reply]
 
Robin, I replied to this previously but your question is very interesting
and my mind keeps returning to the implications it might have for exotic
states like the hydrino or fractional hydrogen. I have been supporting an
argument that time is a true spatial dimension based on the local
perspective of the spatially accelerated twin of Paradox. Said twin can also
achieve acceleration equivalently from a massive gravitational well. Both
scenarios increase vacuum energy density from the perspective of a remote
observer and create a retarding time dilation -[getting late and I don't
presently recall how I tied time dilation to energy density but I can
resurrect that later if you require], Casimir effect reduces energy density
and should therefore create an accelerating time dilation - the time units
and therefore the axis shrinks from our perspective but as always everything
appears unchanged in the inertial frame regardless if it is positive or
negative acceleration. The gas atoms we infuse into these Casimir
"suppression" zones translate to the new energy density courtesy of a
quantum effect supplied by the surroundings. You suggested my MAHG-like ZPE
extraction theory would exhaust the thermal energy available reducing the
gas to liquid or solid state near absolute zero. My reply hasn't changed but
the underlying concept of time and space inside a cavity exchanges
properties from our perspective outside. The deuterium ice or condensed
hydrogen may be the results of this constant thermal drain being spread over
many years and copious amounts of space from the perspective inside the
cavity - remember that the further confined or fractional the hydrogen
becomes the smaller it's time quantum becomes and the larger the existing
space therefore appears. I doubt the temperature would ever decline from our
perspective since we perceive the returning reactants as having undergone
accelerated numbers of reactions in a very brief period of time turning the
metric on its head! We are really just turning the same energy upon itself
at two different scales, the gas responds to zitter very locally with
constant random motion while at another scale the quantum effect of Casimir
geometry varies the average energy density. IMHO catalytic disassociation
provides the opportunity for an asymmetrical thermal path between bond
states and using a cooling loop to extract this energy while reforming h2 is
a win-win situation since you can then disassociate the molecules again at a
discount when they migrate to a different energy density. The PWM should be
able to find  populations of suitably "displaced" fractional molecules where
the covalent bond is opposing the desire of the individual atoms to
translate to a different energy density such that the thermal energy
required to disassociate the molecule is less than the energy released when
molecules reform due to the heat extraction. My suspicion is this process
would even generate a circulation pattern and even a somewhat dangerous
reservoir of h2 for control considerations, 
 
 
I remain undecided on whether a hydrino can leak more easily through a
stainless Steele reactor since we have never seen the hydrino or fractional
hydrogen outside the qualifying environment provided by the catalyst but I
could believe a cold dihydrino or other hydrino compound might retain their
temporal axis orientation even when the qualifying suppression is lessened
such that they could migrate through the lattice in their fractional state.
I don't think it can persist without any suppression and would disassociate
outside the lattice or be reduced to some very weak fractional values that
the covalent bond can maintain for a short period.
 
Regards
Fran
 

 

Reply via email to