Guys. You missed this one.
Ivan Mellen May 3rd, 2011 at 6:49 PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=7#comment-36613> Mr. Rossi, ……. I have two questions: a) How close to the nickel melting point (1455 C) can reactor temperature be? (This is important for rocket engine efficiency.) b) If output power is significantly reduced, is refueling period extended proportionally? (This has impact on the long term system heating.) Andrea Rossi May 4th, 2011 at 1:05 AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=7#comment-36670> …….. About your questions: a- the temp inside the reactor reached the 1,600 °C b- yes Warm Regards, A.R. The catalyst can sustain heat beyond the melting point of nickel. He must be using nickel oxide to sustain 1600C. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2011-05-05 00:14, Jed Rothwell wrote: > >> 97 some time ago. Not sure when, or how many were in the lab being lined >> up for the 1 MW reactor. >> >> 105 on May 1, 2011 >> (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=6#comment-36179) >> >> 147 today, May 4, 2011 >> > > Add this. Discrepancy? > > * * * > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=7#comment-36695 > > Andrea Rossi > May 4th, 2011 at 5:06 AM > > Dear Luke Mortensen: > 1- up to now we have in operation 170 modules of the 300 that will compound > the 1 MW plant. > 2- Thank you: You cannot imagine how much in this moment I need moral > sustain. > Warm regards, > A.R. > > * * * > > Cheers, > S.A. > > >
