Confined Proton close proximity to free electrons in the lattice-but they can 
establish orbitals as the electrons are sucked into the space between the 
protons. Should we call it a new state of matter---Protonium??? These neutrons 
are moving very minimally not like the neutrons from other nuclear reactions, 
fusion or fission.
There is another case where like charges are clustered together: The Sphere on 
a Van de Graaf Generator accumulates electrons on the outside surface. Usually 
people argue that they are spreading out as much as possible to get away from 
each other, but that simply is not true. Yes they are retreating as far as 
possible from the charges on the opposite outer surface of the sphere; however, 
they crowd next to each other on the very surface whereas one should expect 
them to distribute themselves on the inside of the sphere as well as the 
outside of the sphere; instead, they would all rather crowd together on the 
surface! I realize that particles are modeled as having "spin" but there is 
some thought that this is not physically real.  This however would be caused by 
a literal spin causing the like charges to magnetically attract each other. 
(Draw a bunch of clockwise circling arrows adjacent sides are moving in 
opposite directions causing them to attract each other, just as parallel wires 
are attracted to each other if an electrical current travels through them in 
opposite directions.
In other words, we might want to model shells of spinning protons being driven 
outward by magnetic repulsion (since all rotating protons in the shell have 
like-magnetic poles (S-S) or (N-N) on opposite sides of the sphere, causing it 
to forcefully expand into the lattice where the relatively stationary protons 
can assimilate electrons in the confinement of the lattice..
Perhaps 

Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:21:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mass-to-Energy
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]



>From all experimental indications, I agree that this multi
proton fusion is what makes the Rossi reactor and go. To put some conceptual
meat on this bone, at least 60 some odd protons and maybe many more are packed
into a small (sub nanometer?) hole in the lattice of nickel. 

 

 

These protons are comprised of two ups quarks and a down quark.
There is no anti matter clustering (allowed?) inside the hydrogen nucleus.

 

 

Some trigger event happens to this collection of protons
that convert some substantial fraction of these many protons to neutrons 
comprised
of one up quark and two down quarks. Some ultra low energy based factor in
nature can transform up and down quarks into each other are beyond the pale of 
today’s
physics.

 

 

Even thinking that this mechanism of transmutation is even possible
is a burning offence at CERN. Is it even too extreme for Vortex?

 

 



On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

Add multibody H reaction; not H+H but H+H+H+H . . . Not sure how many times.



- Jed




                                          

Reply via email to